Post-Dogmatist Quarterly


FLUX AETERNA
Gerald O'Connell
http://www.gacoc.demon.co.uk/
     The Flux Aeterna project commenced in August 1990 with
    the development of a single imperfect curve. I was, at the
    time, only faintly aware of the thought processes that had
    attracted me to the idea, but, as the drawings proceeded, 
    I found much of the activity to be mechanical. I was, 
    therefore, able to reflect at some length upon the genesis
    of the work, and also upon many aspects of its aesthetic
    and psychological significance.
     I have attempted here to set out some of these reflections
    and to impose some sort of order and coherence upon them. I
    should make it clear, however, that I can promise nothing 
    that would amount to a rationale, explanation or 
    justification. Instead, I offer a modest record of some of 
    the thoughts that have formed and accompanied the making of 
    a series of acrylic ink drawings. The series is incomplete,
    and, I suspect, must necessarily remain so. Much the same
    can be said for the thoughts...
     In July 1990 I afforded myself the luxury of a day spent
    in various public and commercial art galleries in London.
    I saw paintings and drawings of every type and from every 
    era. I ended the day, before returning home, by passing 
    a bookshop specialising in exotic travel. In the window
    was an enormous relief map of part of the Himalayas.
    Deeply and suddenly fascinated by the flowing density of
    its contours, I was surprised to find that I drew more 
    pleasure from the map than anything else I had seen that 
    day. 

     In a popular discussion of cosmological themes I came 
    across the engaging speculation that the entirety of 
    existence is owed to a single random disturbance in the 
    primordial waveform. 'Being', it would seem' is nothing 
    more than the relentless and often chaotic development of 
    this irregularity.

     All we have, our only means of understanding, is the 
    picture. The totality of our discourse, internal and 
    external, is by way of analogy - by means of various kinds 
    of pictures. We tend to think of maps as a special, very
    powerful but limited, type of picture. But perhaps we should
    regard every picture as really just a type of map - an 
    attempt to make a diagram of an area of thought. 

     Flux Aeterna could be regarded, perhaps mischievously, as 
    a philosophical enquiry into the nature of change and 
    movement, conducted within (carto)graphic parameters - because
    some truths cannot be explained, they can only be drawn. The
    pen is mightier than the word... 

     There are certain mathematical patterns that are of great 
    fundamental simplicity - basic expressions of quantity and
    extension. They can seem to act together as a kind of motor
    for being, always in flux, shifting, ticking away beneath
    the veil of the physical. They are independent of categories
    like mass or time. Any graphical representation of them
    must be totally ambiguous as to scale, appearing at once as
    both cosmic and microscopic. In such maps there can be no
    objects or things, only the shadows of action or the 
    trajectories of potential. In an age of religious 
    superstition the cartogropher who sought to record these 
    pathways might have been described as exploring God's 
    fingerprint. In our age of scientific superstition the same
    activity will, perhaps, be described in terms of chaos 
    theory.

     ...not things moving, but movement itself - so persistent
    and inevitable that it creates coagulant clouds and
    apparitions out of itself; and we mistake these blurred 
    ghosts for the ultimate components, the particles and forces
    from which, we persuade ourselves, existence itself must be 
    constructed.. 

     I have, from time to time, been forced to describe these
    drawings as 'abstract'. But the abstract represents forms of 
    conceptual reality, while the representation is merely an 
    abstraction from the real. We cannot stand apart from 
    reality. An idea is a thing. Every attempt to bring reason
    to bear on this activity seems to end in paradox, and it is
    not clear whether the problem lies with the activity or with
    reason itself. Perhaps paradox is all there is... 

     I am aware that I am making another world for myself, a
    garden of forking paths where every step taken invites yet
    more. I walk to feed a sense of astonishment upon which I
    have come to depend. Thus, what commences as an activity 
    becomes a condition.